(812) 309-78-59
(495) 223-46-76
ASTM C374-70(2009)
Standard Test Methods for Fusion Flow of Porcelain Enamel Frits (Flow-Button Methods)
5 стр.
Заменен
Печатное изданиеЭлектронный (pdf)
96.72 $ (включая НДС 20%)
Разработчик:
Зарубежные/ASTM
ICS:
25.220.50 Enamels / Эмали
Сборник (ASTM):
02.05 Metallic and Inorganic Coatings; Metal Powders and Metal Powder Products / Металлические и неорганические покрытия, Металлические порошки, изделия из металлического порошка
Тематика:
Paints & Related Coatings
Описание
Реферат

These test methods cover evaluation of the relative fusion flow characteristics of samples of a given porcelain enamel by comparison with an established standard for that frit. Two test methods are included, differing only in certain details of the samples and in the apparatus and procedure for preparation of test specimens. Both test methods give equally reproducible results and provide a satisfactory basis for comparison of fusion flow of the sample with that of the established standard. Test Method A employs granular particles of frit to which a bonding agent has been added. Button specimens are formed under high pressure in a hydraulic press. Test Method B employs crushed, sized particles of frit to which a bonding agent has been added. Button specimens are formed in a steel mold by hand. Both Test Methods use a hard steel mortar that is resistant to abrasion by the porcelain enamel frit, a hydraulic press, and a fusion flow rack. The test methods use sieves of different specifications. The steel mold assembly of both test methods consists of a die and plunger, however, Test Method B has an additional back-up disk.

Область применения

1.1 These test methods cover evaluation of the relative fusion flow characteristics of samples of a given porcelain enamel frit by comparison with an established standard for that frit.

1.2 Two test methods are included, differing only in certain details of the samples and in the apparatus and procedure for preparation of test specimens. Both test methods give equally reproducible results and provide a satisfactory basis for comparison of fusion flow of the sample with that of the established standard.

1.2.1 Test Method A employs granular particles of frit to which a bonding agent has been added. Button specimens are formed under high pressure in a hydraulic press.

1.2.2 Test Method B employs crushed, sized particles of frit to which a bonding agent has been added. Button specimens are formed in a steel mold by hand.

1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Ключевые слова:
comparative test; fusion flow; glass coating; molten flow; porcelain enamel frits; Flow and flow rate; Fusion; Porcelain enamel products--frit; Flow and flow rate; Fusion; Porcelain enamel products--frit