3.1 The advantages of using conical tow nets are as follows:
3.1.1 They are relatively inexpensive and highly versatile in a variety of inland, estuarine, coastal, and marine waters.
3.1.2 They can be used from a small or large powered boat with a minimum of auxiliary equipment.
3.1.3 They can be used to collect qualitative samples and semiquantitative samples when fitted with a flowmeter and even better samples when fitted with a companion meter on the outside of the hoop to monitor filtering efficiency.
3.2 The disadvantages of conical tow nets are as follows:
3.2.1 When equipped with a flowmeter they require frequent maintenance including calibration and, in some types, lubrication.
3.2.2 They are effective only where drawn through a stream of water having considerable thickness. They are not suitable for collecting samples from a small or restricted region.
3.2.3 They are not suitable for collecting in very shallow water.
3.2.4 They are clogged by grass beds, coelenterates, and filamentous algae.
3.2.5 When used with a flowmeter, they collect only qualitative samples, or semiquantitative samples.
3.2.6 When sampling discrete depths using a horizontal tow, the sample can be contaminated from other depths during the deployment and retrieval of the samples if opening and closing devices are not used.
3.3 There are several special considerations that shall be observed when using conical tow nets. They are:
3.3.1 Conical tow net samplers are designed to be towed at speeds less than three knots; however, greater speeds have been used for the larger nets with a concomitant increase in capture.2
3.3.2 A conical tow net 0.5 m in diameter or larger shall be used to reduce avoidance by organisms.2
3.3.3 The nets shall be washed frequently and inspected for pin-size holes, tears, net deterioration, and other anomalies.
3.3.4 Nets should be allowed to dry while suspended full length in air and in subdued light prior to storage.
3.3.5 Lower catches per sample may result when collections are made during the day. These are particularly noted in the larger zooplanktons.
TABLE 1 Size of Common ZooplanktonASpecies
Fresh
Marine
Habitat
Size Range
Habitat
Size Range
Protozoans (single cells)
6 to 1,000 μ
−2.0 mm
Ciliophora (ciliated single cells)
few fresh
22 to 600 μ
Coelenterata
few fresh (Hydras)
<20 mm
Ctenophora
10 to 121 mm
Platyhelminthes (flatworms)
1 to 30 mm
inland waters
0.5 to 40 mm
Nemertea (Proboscus worms)
<20 mm
great variation
5 mm to 6.5 m
Nematoda (Round worms)
<2.3 mm
7 mm
Nematomorpha (horsehair
worms)
pools, slow brooks
10 to 70 cm
Gastrotricha
most fresh (shallow)
70 μ–615 μ
Rotifera
90 percent fresh
80 μ–1,500 μ
Bryozoa (moss animals)
some fresh;
most species encrusting
statoblasts
0.4 to >1.0 mm
statoblasts
Chaetognatha (arrowworms)
high salinity
up to 40 mm
Annelida (segmented worms)
Oligochaeta
most fresh
0.5 to 5 mm
very few
Polychaeta
few fresh
most spp. small except Nereis
up to 50 cm
Hirundinea
most fresh (standing
adults 5 mm to 45.7 cm
few marine
waters)
Arthropoda
Crustacea
Branchlopoda
most fresh
3 mm to 30 mm
some marine
10 mm
Cladocerans
most fresh
(lenthic waters)
up to 3 mm; 0.2 to 18.0 mm
0.6, 0.3, 0.4 mm; 1.7, 1.0, 0.9 mm
few marine
most estuarine/marine
in top of
bottom sediment
Ostracoda
Copepoda
Calenoida
nauplius—<4.0 mm
0.5 to 10.0 mm
Cyclopoida
nauplius—<3.0 mm
<0.5 to 1.0 mm
Harpacticoid
nauplius—1.0 mm
<0.5 to 1.0 m
Ectoparasites
some fresh
5 to 25 mm
some estuarine
5.5 to 25 mm
Cirripedia
estuarine/marine:nauplii
Mysidacea
few in cold lakes
8 to 30 mm
Amphipoda
some fresh
5 to 25 mm
5 to 30 mm
Decapoda
some associated with debris
15 to 200 mm
2.0 mm to 20 to 40 cm
Insecta (aquatic)
most fresh
Mollusca
Gastropoda
adults <2 to 70 mm
8 to 80 mm trochophore
Pelecypoda
some fresh
adults 2 to 250 mm
most have free
swimming larvae
Echinodermata
Fish eggs/larvae
eggs 0.75 to 3 mm
400 μ to 505 μ
larvae 1.5 mm
A Sage, L. E., “Zooplankton ,” In: Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Mineral Mining Impacts on Aquatic Communities: A Review and Analysis, Fish Wildlife Service/Office of Biological Services, Vol 78/No. 30, April 1978, pp 55–65. Область применения
1.1 This practice covers the procedure for obtaining qualitative samples of a zooplankton community by use of conical tow nets. Nets will collect most zooplankton, but some forms will avoid nets.
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.